Thursday, May 17, 2012

I plead the fifth... and the ninth

As of this writing, mere hours after handily beating the Yankees, the Blue Jays hold the best run differential in the American League East, a +22. Their run differential is second in the AL in fact, behind Texas who is currently holding a run differential three runs higher than the entire AL east at +78.

It's early in the season yet, and the Jays are still in fourth place in the division, but a healthy and positive run differential is a very encouraging sign. They are scoring a decent number of runs in a variety of different innings, the most (37) coming in the third, which is also the inning in which they score most frequently (15 times). What is discouraging to me are the runs being scored against the Jays in two particular innings on a seemingly regular basis. In the 38 games played so far, the opposition has scored 41 runs in the fifth inning and 30 in the ninth. In those 38 games, 17 of them had at least one run cross the plate in the fifth and 14 had at least one in the ninth.

See the nifty table below.

Blue Jays
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
X
Totals
Runs
10
6
37
26
10
32
14
24
9
7
175
Instances
9
5
15
14
6
15
9
12
7
2
94











Opposition
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
X
Totals
Runs
10
21
5
11
41
12
10
8
30
5
153
Instances
8
12
5
9
17
9
6
5
14
2
87
Note: Runs are runs, instances are innings where at least one run is scored, and the X represents extra innings.

Yes, Sergio Santos struggled before his injury, and the fun times that were had with KoKo B. Ware should sufficiently explain the ninth inning issues, but the concern is not with the bullpen, it is with the starting rotation. The starters have pitched through the fifth inning in all but one game - when Kyle Drabek was pulled after getting one out in the fifth - he was responsible for three of the four runs posted in that inning.

As I said before, it is still very early in the season, and this could be a glaring example of trying to glean answers from a small sample size, but what could cause a scoring spike in the same inning on a somewhat regular basis? Could it be that the starters are wearing down by the fifth and giving up too many good pitches or walking too many batters? Maybe by that point in the game, the opposition has had a good look at their pitch selection and delivery and they are taking advantage of familiar patterns. If that's all true, then why have the Jays only scored 10 runs compared to the opposition's 41?

If I were a real statsasabrmetrigician I might know the answers, but I am just a fan who happened to notice that his favorite team has been giving up runs in roughly the same spot in about half of the games they've played so far. One of these days I'll look up more than box scores to try and sort it out. Until then, I'll try and forget about the 41 runs in the fifth, and enjoy the +22 run differential.

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Home runs in Anaheim: nighttime, anytime, it's alright

Baseball analysts on television are a funny breed. They mix stats and narrative to help package a product, to provide insight on what is happening in the field of play. Recently, the Blue Jays were in Anaheim to play the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim at Angel Stadium of Anaheim while Anaheim peppers were being grown miles away in New Mexico.

During a night game, Edwin Encarnacion flied out to center field which caused Gregg Zaun, former Blue Jays catcher and current Rogers Sportsnet analyst, to reason that it would have been a home run had it not been for the 'marine layer'. He purported that a layer of air forms in the Los Angeles area at night which keeps the ball down, turning extra base hits into easy outs. I had heard this theory before, but never in such detail. After a cursory glance at the Wikipedia entry on the marine layer, I was led to believe that the phenomenon would be dispersed by the heat of the sun, and there would be more of an effect on home runs hit in day games, while the dense layer of air was still hanging around.

I didn't take Zaun for much of a meteorologist, and for my first foray into baseball spreadsheetery (a term I just coined), I wanted to prove him wrong. I pored over game logs for Angel Stadium of Anaheim from 2002 to 2011. For my theory to be correct, there would have to be more home runs hit during night games, and for Zaun to be the next Harold Hosein, the opposite would have to be true. Here are the findings:


Year HR/Day HR/Night
2002 2.09 1.69
2003 1.95 1.82
2004 2.17 2.10
2005 2.17 1.68
2006 2.04 1.62
2007 1.30 1.71
2008 2.36 1.73
2009 2.43 2.38
2010 1.68 1.69
2011 1.44 1.67

As you can see, with the exception of 2007, 2011 and by the slightest of margins 2010 - Zaun was right. There is a definite decrease in number of home runs hit in night games compared to day games. It should be noted that over the ten-year span, there were fewer home runs hit in Angel Stadium (1495) than in games played by the Angels on the road (1666).


That's one instance of an analyst that's not completely off the mark when it comes to facts and narrative. Now if we could only get Buck Martinez to stop calling Ben Francisco a 'veteran'.

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

I'm back, baby!


It's been about three quarters of a year since I've written here - that's a perfectly reasonable amount of time between posts, isn't it? A lot has happened in the past nine months, some of which I will probably most definitely get in to eventually if it strikes me maybe. You'll be mostly subjected to very amateur baseball analysis, recipes that I've either swiped from the internet or come up with on my own, and snippets of my life with my wife our cat. Our cat named Elephant.

That's right, a cat named Elephant.

Buckle up for a wild ride.